|
Coffee Shop Talk of a non sexual Nature Visit Sam's Alfresco Heaven. Singapore's best Alfresco Coffee Experience! If you're up to your ears with all this Sex Talk and would like to take a break from it all to discuss other interesting aspects of life in Singapore, pop over and join in the fun. |
|
Thread Tools |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Ho Kwon Ping’s Self-Serving Proposals Have No Merit
An honorable member of the Coffee Shop Has Just Posted the Following:
http://sonofadud.com/2014/11/15/ho-k...have-no-merit/ So the Foreign workers levy doesn’t help Singaporeans and is ineffective. So isn’t Ho’s proposal an improvement? Ho’s proposal is to convert the levy into a deferred savings account for the foreign workers. The same problems apply. • Employers can theoretically reduce their foreign workers’ direct pay by up to the full amount of the deferred savings because these workers will be able to access their savings when they return to their home country. •Given foreign workers’ weak bargaining power it is likely that employers will be able to cut their direct pay substantially. •Ho’s proposal thus amounts effectively to a removal of the tax on foreign labour. •Employers are likely to respond by employing MORE foreign labour and cutting back on their usage of Singaporeans as far as they are able. Why is that self -serving? While the number of Mr Ho’s employees in Singapore appears to be small, he speaks clearly with the economic interests of employers in mind and not Singaporean workers or even foreign workers. What’s your solution? • A better solution would be to have a minimum wage that was mandatory for all workers, both local and foreign. •This would remove the ability of employers to drive down foreign workers’ wages to the detriment of Singaporeans competing with them for jobs. •The levy could then be converted into a CPF account for foreign workers or retained as a tax on foreign labour. My preference would be to have a cap on the overall number of foreign workers and then auction the entitlements to the highest bidders. This would ensure that foreign workers were allocated to where they would be most productive while controlling the overall levels. The cap could be adjusted up and down to keep wage growth in line with productivity growth. Unfortunately judging by the comments on my Facebook page many employers are unhappy that the Government is not subsidising them more to take on foreign workers and making it easier for them to employ foreigners. This will always be so as far as employers are concerned. Labour can never be cheap enough. Slave owners in the American South worried that if slavery was abolished labour would become too expensive to allow them to profitably grow cotton and other crops. Lets hope that Singaporeans are not too naïve to see through the arguments of special interest groups that appear to have altruistic motives but are actually trying to gain a commercial advantage. http://sonofadud.com/2014/11/15/ho-k...have-no-merit/ Click here to view the whole thread at www.sammyboy.com. |
Advert Space Available |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
|
|